Delay is information
A week of silence after a strong interview is not neutral. The candidate reads it as indecision, disorganisation or disinterest, and one of those is usually right.
The teams that win competitive hires are rarely the ones paying most. They are the ones who came back within a day, every time.
Too many stages signals uncertainty
Five interviews tells a candidate that nobody in the process is confident enough to make a decision. For senior people, that is a preview of what working there will feel like.
Three well-designed stages with clear owners will assess more than five vague ones, and will not lose you the person while you run them.
- Every stage has a named owner and a clear purpose
- Feedback goes back within 24 hours, always
- The package is discussed early, not at the end
- Someone senior sells the role, not just assesses for it
The rejection matters too
Most of the people who go through your process will not be hired. They will talk about the experience regardless, and in specialist markets the community is small enough that it gets back around.
A clear, quick, human no costs very little and is remembered. So is a silence.
Speed and clarity in a hiring process are not administrative details. They are the strongest signal you send about the company.
Hiring for a role like this, or weighing a move?
Talk to us
